§ 01 / FUNDAMENTAL

Fundamental difference

Milling: the part is fixed, the cutting tool rotates. Material is removed by moving the tool along X, Y, Z axes (and optionally rotation). Best for prismatic parts (blocks, brackets, plates) with features on multiple faces.

Turning (lathe): the part rotates, the cutting tool is stationary (but moves along X and Z). Material is removed concentrically around the rotating axis. Best for cylindrical parts (shafts, pins, rings, flanges).

These differ fundamentally in:

  • How material is stocked (rod/bar for turning, plate/block for milling)
  • How cycle time scales (turning fast for cylindrical, milling better for complex shapes)
  • What features are easy (round features on turning, pockets on milling)
  • Machine cost and hourly rate (often lower for turning)
§ 02 / WHEN

When turning wins

01

Round shafts and pins

Standard lathe operation. Cycle times 1-5 minutes for typical parts. Concentricity held to ±0.005 mm easily.

02

Flanges, washers, bushings

Circular parts with optional off-center features (holes, slots) machined in secondary operation or on mill-turn.

03

Threaded fasteners, bolts

Threads cut on lathe are the industry standard. Fast, accurate, cost-effective at any volume.

04

High production volumes

For production runs above 100 units of a cylindrical part, CNC turning is 2-5× faster than milling equivalent. Use mill-turn or dedicated lathes.

05

Small precision parts (Swiss territory)

Parts under 25 mm diameter with tight tolerances. Swiss lathes are purpose-built for this, holding ±0.005 mm while producing at ~30 parts per minute.

§ 03 / WHEN

When milling wins

01

Brackets, housings, plates

Prismatic parts with holes, pockets, slots on multiple faces. 3-axis milling with single setup is faster than trying to turn a brick-shaped part.

02

Parts with complex 3D features

Curved pockets, angled surfaces, complex contours. Milling is the only CNC process that handles these natively.

03

Parts requiring close tolerances on multiple axes

Mounting plates with holes aligned across multiple setups. Milling with precision fixtures holds the geometry better than turning + secondary operations.

04

Heavy stock-removal parts

Large brackets from thick plate. Milling handles the bulk efficiently. Turning from large round stock wastes material.

05

Small-medium volumes

Under 100 units, milling setup for prismatic parts is more economical than dedicated turning tooling.

§ 04 / MILL-TURN

Mill-turn — the hybrid

Mill-turn machines combine both operations on one machine:

  • Full turning capability (spindle, live tools)
  • Milling of off-axis features without repositioning
  • Single setup for parts with both round and prismatic features

Used for:

  • Parts with cylindrical body + off-axis holes or flats
  • Shafts with keyways, splines, or gear teeth
  • Production parts needing tight tolerance between cylindrical and milled features

Cost: higher per hour ($180-300 US, $65-100 China) but often faster overall for parts requiring both operations. Eliminates multiple setups and their associated tolerance stack-up.

§ 05 / COST

Cost comparison

ProcessUS hourly rateChina hourly rateBest for
3-axis milling$65-95$20-35Prismatic parts, general CNC
Standard turning$55-85$18-30Cylindrical parts
Swiss turning$80-130$30-50Small precision cylindrical
Mill-turn$180-300$65-100Hybrid geometry
5-axis milling$110-160$40-60Complex 3D surfaces

Rule of thumb for mixed geometry: split into separate parts if possible. A shaft with a bracket attached is typically cheaper as two parts joined by a dowel pin, rather than one complex mill-turn part.

READY WHEN YOU ARE

Milling, turning, or mill-turn?

Email [email protected] with your drawing. We have dedicated milling, turning, Swiss, and mill-turn capability — we'll quote using the most appropriate process, not the most expensive one.

Start a quote →